why isnt it MVD? a game like this u wanna see both povs :) did griff post it? i certainly wonder why then, he played like crap compared to the adrenalin games recently posted. YES i said crap! i went there, nah but at least it wasnt normal griff standard imo, like the ones vs adrenalin when u get hardon, he had like shake aim and felt insecure sort of, and also it felt a bit tourny style ?
Friday 11 Aug 2006, 14:51
#3:
filurifax
my guess would be that spec recorded judging from description. as for playstyle, maybe because of opponent
Saturday 12 Aug 2006, 04:54
#4:
razor
i didnt see any spec as i remember, maybe i remember wrong thou :) and yes im aware a better opponent can make you look worse, dunno if it was like that here thou even thou jon is probably better than adrena
Saturday 12 Aug 2006, 12:14
#5:
lohe
#2 Nice punctuation there! I think it's the first time I see you using something else than just commas and smileys to separate your sentences.
Saturday 12 Aug 2006, 13:37
#6:
razor
haha lol, commas is underestimated, :)
Sunday 13 Aug 2006, 09:28
#7:
jOn
Razor, i think griff played well, he looks smooth as allways. Just becouse i dont jump stright into hes rocks dosnt mean he played bad... ;)
Sunday 13 Aug 2006, 14:55
#8:
razor
i judged from overall movement and his aim which looked rusty, like those games u play the first game of the day or something :) but ofcourse i know a better opponent make you look worse
Sunday 13 Aug 2006, 14:59
#9:
jOn
And mvd-demos allways makes the movement look "better" this is ordinary qwd :)
Thursday 17 Aug 2006, 01:48
#10:
Anonymous
No it doesn't make the movement look better, but rather smoother, which is quite a difference. ("commas is underestimated" /agree :P)
Sunday 20 Aug 2006, 10:13
#11:
phil
smooth is better in my book
you dont notice the rough edges in qwd that get smoothed out in mvd